The newest Church picked after that to disregard what the law states

The newest Church picked after that to disregard what the law states

Even though it y is a very common habit about Mormon religion, and this this new Mormon faith keeps served polyandry throughout record, the truth is your Mormon people today do not behavior polygamy, but contemplate it becoming a serious crime resistant to the laws of your own house, and additionally contrary to the guidelines of one’s gospel.

Polyandry Example one to Lay Judge Precedent

George Reynolds belonged with the Church away from God Christ from Latter-Date Saints (the latest “Mormon” Church) as he are charged with bigamy inside the 1874. The fresh LDS Church thought during the time the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act off 1862 try unconstitutional, as it refused the brand new Church’s professionals the legal right to routine its religion freely by allowing them to have several spouses, which had been element of its religion. The brand new Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act try a legislation, signed because of the President Abraham Lincoln, you to definitely prohibited polygamy, and you will limited the amount of chapel- and you can low-profit-owned areas in order to a maximum property value $50,000.

S. Attorney several witnesses who you may attest that Reynolds performed in fact have a couple spouses, hence he was indicted to possess bigamy by the a huge Jury inside Oct regarding 1874

Since the Utah is actually a much-flung nest, and Lincoln got his give complete toward burgeoning Civil Conflict, legislation wasn’t enforced. The reason behind the fresh charge against Reynolds try he elia Jane Schofield as he had been .

Reynolds is being employed as an assistant for the president of your LDS Chapel at the time. Meanwhile, the new Church’s ruling human body agreed to assist the U.S. Supreme Courtroom that have an examination instance who does let dictate the brand new constitutionality of your own anti-bigamy legislation by giving the latest Judge having an excellent offender. Reynolds offered to act as that accused, to check whether the laws violated the brand new people’s Basic Amendment legal rights. He then wanted to the newest U.

Reynolds tried to have the demonstration judge instruct the latest jury you to if they sensed he’d committed bigamy towards the only goal of pursuing the their religion, then have to be located simple. Although not, the newest judge rejected their request and you can rather trained new jury that once they discovered that Reynolds, under the influence of their religion:

“… purposely married a moment go out, having an initial wife way of life, the new need away from consciousness out-of evil intent-the fresh new want regarding understanding on the his part that he was committing crime-failed to justification your, although laws inexorably, in these instances, indicates criminal intention.”

  • It absolutely was their duty, depending on his faith, in order to endment secure their religious techniques
  • One their huge jury had not been lawfully constituted (legitimate according to the rules)
  • That demands that have been increased by the certain jurors had been poorly overruled from the court
  • One to one testimony considering is actually inadmissible because it had been considering right up not as much as several other indictment

The fresh Utah Territorial Supreme Court disagreed, but not, and you can kept Reynolds’ sentence when you look at the 1876. In the Court’s unanimous decision, it had been stated that:

“Everybody else with a wife or husband life, just who marries some other, whether or not partnered or unmarried, within the a region, or any other lay more than that the You provides exclusive legislation, was guilty of bigamy, and you can might be punished by a superb of only $five hundred, and also by imprisonment for an expression out of not more than five years.”

The newest Legal performed take notice on regardless if Reynolds might use their religion given that a cover, because the Reynolds got debated that, since an citas interraciales filipinas excellent Mormon, it absolutely was their religious obligations to apply polygamy.

The Court performed realize that Congress usually do not citation a laws you to prohibits some one away from freely doing its faith. Although not, the brand new it stored your legislation that forbids bigamy doesn’t see you to practical, and therefore the concept that someone need to have only 1 partner might possibly be traced entirely back once again to English legislation lower than Queen James We out of England, upon which You.S. legislation is actually situated.